The City of Sydney is currently investing in a number of infrastructure projects that require tunnel excavations within the Triassic Hawkesbury Sandstone. It is generally accepted that this formation has high residual stresses of tectonic' origin, so much so that these stresses have been implicated in a number of well-known failures and problems for tunnelling. These include failure of roof beams' comprising discrete beds in the crown of tunnel excavations; stress-induced spalling and slabbing' of tunnel walls; shear displacement between beds causing the failure of rock bolts; strain in adjacent infrastructure and, the necessity for re-grouting of high conductivity fractures due to stress relief dilation after excavation. Whilst there is an extensive published database of in situ stress measurements comprising hydrofrac', over-coring' and slotter' stress measurements, these data indicate a considerable spread of results. The traditional approach to interpreting this data has been to attempt to fit linear correlations to stress versus depth data, based on personal experience and back-analysis' of monitoring data during construction. However, there are a number of such correlations in the literature and there is divergence of opinion regarding the assessment of background' in situ stress and appropriate upper and lower bound values for design. This paper provides a brief review of the published data; suggestions on an alternative risk-based approach' to assigning in situ stresses for design; and, proposals on how in situ stress tests may be conducted in future to improve the quality of the database available to designers.CITATION:Macklin, S, McKay, G and Erskine, M, 2014. A review of the in situ stress database for tunnel design in the Hawkesbury Sandstone, Sydney, New South Wales, in Proceedings 15th Australasian Tunnelling Conference 2014 , pp 171-178 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).