Skip to main content
Conference Proceedings

Life-of-Mine Conference 2018

Conference Proceedings

Life-of-Mine Conference 2018

PDF Add to cart

Planning for (not so) final land use

To effectively plan for closure, we must have an end-point in mind. To undertake meaningful rehabilitation, a post-mine land use (or uses) must be known._x000D_
However, it is becoming more apparent that the end-point or goal-posts are shifting - and may continue to do so throughout the life of a mine. As well as being safe, stable and not causing environmental harm, post-mine land uses should always be sustainable, achievable within the given land capability, and they should involve stakeholders in their design and development.The majority of mines in Australia, and around the World, were historically expected to return disturbed land to either native ecosystem or agriculture/forestry practices. However, examples of highly successful final land uses suggest that today's focus on closure includes not only minimising future liability and impact but also - and importantly - a move towards the creation of economic opportunity (Murphy and Heyes, 2016).CITATION:Durbin, J, 2018. Planning for (not so) final land use, in Proceedings Life-of-Mine 2018, pp 110-112 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Return to parent product
  • Planning for (not so) final land use
    PDF
    This product is exclusive to Digital library subscription
  • Planning for (not so) final land use
    PDF
    Normal price $16.50
    Member price from $0.00
    Add to cart

    Fees above are GST inclusive

PD Hours
Approved activity
  • Published: 2018
  • PDF Size: 0.031 Mb.
  • Unique ID: P201802030

Our site uses cookies

We use these to improve your browser experience. By continuing to use the website you agree to the use of cookies.