The media in Australia is currently rife with articles and pronouncements on global warming as the most significant crisis of our time, which may threaten the future of civilisation as we know it'. This has been recently reinforced by release of Al Gore's film An Inconvenient Truth', and one would be led to believe that the science of global warming is settled. And yet there is a strong body of literature disputing this apparent consensus which suggests that care should be exercised in introducing radical policies to solve a crisis which may not be real. Such policies would have a major impact on those in professions such as engineering (project approvals and design to minimise greenhouse gas emissions), accounting (carbon tax issues) and the law (corporate disputes on greenhouse gas issues are already in train in the USA)._x000D_
This paper addresses the hysteria apparent in the climate change debate by presenting factual evidence relating to climate change and the current phase of mild global warming. Some of the more extreme statements on future impacts are repudiated with published data, and alternatives to the purported role of fossil fuels in temperature change are offered. The potential impact of political decisions on professional activity is discussed, as are the implications of a possible future reversal of the scientific consensus, as has occurred in the past. The paper concludes with a call for the professions to exercise their Learned Society role to ensure that a rational and public debate is held on the broad issue of climate change._x000D_
FORMAL CITATION:Walker, L K and Leyland, B, 2007. The responsibility of the professions to understand climate change, in Proceedings New Leaders' 2007, pp 75-78 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).