Skip to main content
Conference Proceedings

Annual Conference, Melbourne

Conference Proceedings

Annual Conference, Melbourne

PDF Add to cart

Some Comments on the Accuracy and Precision of Sampling and Analysis for Gold in Exploration

Three methods of gold analysis are briefly described highlighting some of the problems and advantages of each. The variation of results between samples and splits and due to method preparation are illustrated. The mean percent difference of the fire assay values from the means of sample split values for three cases is 15%. Finally, a comparison of the aqua regia atomic absorption spectroscopy and fire assay fusion AAS techniques is made. This shows that the mean precision, the ability to obtain the same value, of the methods at 98% confidence are +30% and +15% respectively._x000D_
The fire assay fusion atomic absorption spectroscopy method is relatively more accurate than the aqua regia method.
Return to parent product
  • Some Comments on the Accuracy and Precision of Sampling and Analysis for Gold in Exploration
    PDF
    This product is exclusive to Digital library subscription
  • Some Comments on the Accuracy and Precision of Sampling and Analysis for Gold in Exploration
    PDF
    Normal price $22.00
    Member price from $0.00
    Add to cart

    Fees above are GST inclusive

PD Hours
Approved activity
  • Published: 1981
  • PDF Size: 0.249 Mb.
  • Unique ID: P198204030

Our site uses cookies

We use these to improve your browser experience. By continuing to use the website you agree to the use of cookies.